Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Getting Started, Getting Experimental

Note: this blog is an assignment for Museums and New Media, a fall 2010 course at Tufts University.


The history of work and industry is everywhere, and everywhere, it's unique. In recent decades, museums dedicated to 19th and 20th century coal mining, textile mills, steel plants, car manufacturing, railroads, and hundreds of other industries, have increasingly appeared on the cultural landscape. Is there one in your own back yard?
 
A century ago, the Colonial Revival in arts and architecture crafted a nostalgic interpretation of the past, an elite reaction against the perceived dislocations of modern industry, immigration, urbanization. Long story super short, lots of house museums were created. Today, we might talk about an "Industrial Revival," celebrating a vision of traditional industry through museums and the adaptive reuse of ex-factory spaces. Like the Colonial Revival, the "Industrial Revival" builds its own set narratives; it grapples against the dislocations of a postindustrial experience. This blog aims to look around these conventions toward experimental new approaches to interpreting the working past.              
 
Colonial Revival (Wikimedia Commons)/Industrial Revival? (National Park Service)
 Back to your local museum. Why does it exist? What is its main message? After working at one and visiting many over the past six years, I've come to think about museums of work and industry in terms of three main narratives that are conventionally used to answer these questions, but that I feel can be problematic:
 
 1. Commemoration narrative. "Here lies the XYZ Steel Works, dead and gone but not forgotten." Most museums incorporate this basic narrative to a certain extent; relying on it too heavily can lead to nostalgia and irrelevance. It clearly relegates the industry to the realm of past experience, but can also provide a healing sense of continuity in the face of change. See the Lackawanna Steel Plant Museum, which works to "preserve and document the memories of the newly-extinct steel industry."

2. Process narrative. "They don't make 'em like they used to." Most industrial museums also contain a component of explaining the production process. The Boott Cotton Mills Museum at Lowell National Historical Park (ok, this is where I work) has a demonstration weave room and exhibits detailing the main steps of making cloth. This narrative is often intruguing, but can also become very didactic. The Mill City Museum in Minneapolis gets a little more outside of the box with an interactive baking laboratory inside its historic flour mill.
 
3. Progress narrative. "In preserving the history of the once-innovative local widget industry, we can reclaim this spirit of Progress for this city as we forge ahead into the 21st century." Many cities suffering the loss of their traditional economies have seen historic preservation as a route to "revitalization." This narrative contains the positive impulse to make history relevant, but may simplify a complex, painful past for the sake of making it useful to one vision of the future.

Lewis Hine, Cleaner and Sweeper -- Spinning Dept.
of the American Linen Co., Fall River, Mass. (1916).
Library of Congress. Amazing photo, slightly more
subversive narrative.
  
Lewis Hine, Powerhouse Mechanic (1920). Wikimedia CommonsAmazing photo, pretty conventional
progress narrative.


Problem is, this narrative often wants to equate old industries with progress, innovation, power, ingenuity, awesomeness, the American spirit incarnate. Contrast this to, say, many of Lewis Hine's early 20th century photographs, which reflect the exploitative underpinnings of our nation's historic industries. The "Progress narrative" often restricts critical interpretations and multiple points of view that may in fact better serve future progress.

This blog identifies these existing narratives in order to look for alternatives in action. We'll explore the fringes of "Industrial Revival." I believe that our country's working past can play a vibrant role in our cultural present, but that in order to do so we need to break down a few walls, take our exhibits off the assembly line, and get experimental with labor heritage.

So, do you see these mainstream narratives in use? Are there others?
 

4 comments:

  1. I just got back from the NEMA conference where the keynote speaker, Carolo Rotella, spoke about people's nostalgia for the Industrial city. I never before equated it to the Colonial Revival that previously happened, but you are absolutely right. Additionally, I think the causes for each revival is similar (maybe add in globalization to the Industrial Revival).

    As for museums that deal with industrial topics, I have to admit I have never been to one. Maybe it is because I have personal knowledge of what it is like to work in a factory (?). However, if I was to go to an industrial museum, I think I would like to hear less about the actual machinery and more about the personal lives of those working in those industries. I suppose this type of interpretation would be possible in all three of your outlined narratives, but I find it interesting that not one of them mentions people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Continuing on Jennifer's comment, the off-site exhibition critique at NEMA was at the Springfield Armory--the first armory commissioned by George Washington for the soon-to-be United States in 1775. We were there critiquing their 80s style museum, and the main point many of the panel mentioned was that there was too much emphasis on the guns (the output of industry) than on the stories of the people who made them/use them/love them/hate them. The Armory even has 150 oral histories and is not using them! I totally agree that the stories connected to an industry museum are critical to compelling interpretation.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree 100% with both of you that personal stories and experiences are central to effective interpretation in work/industry museums. Museums working with the three big traditional narratives seem to often treat people as an inevitable, but often surprisingly peripheral piece of the interpretation. Glad you pointed out the Armory. Did either of you see the Springfield History Museum while you were at NEMA? I think of that one as another example of product(ion) narrative over people. Hundreds and hundreds of shiny antique motorcycles...Anyway, focusing more on people and real experiences is definitely a main part of where I think experimental industrial museums need to go, so I'll keep an extra eye out for this going forward with the blog :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Emily, thanks for introducing three approaches of building a history museum.

    In my country, we never have a clear definition of what is a history museum. We always mix a history museum with an art museum. It is interesting to know that there are so many ways to interpreting history.

    I agree with Jennifer that I probably will be more interested in people's life than the objects. It was the people that made the objects meaningful.

    ReplyDelete