Let's start with the museum's President and CEO, who retired from the dying Bethlehem Steel Corp. as the VP of Public Affairs. He built a career, and now a second career in the museum field, on carefully crafting a public face for the company. Similar Steel executive backgrounds for most board members. Steve, I swear, it's not personal. I'm just wary of the constraints this arrangement has the potential to place on critical, multi-vocal interpration.
Second, here's how the Smithsonian website describes the NMIH: "The National Museum of Industrial History will tell the story of America's industrial achievements and accomplishments of its inventors, managers and workers, and preserve the record of industry's development and advancements from the mid 1800's to the present [Italics mine]." This is a classic progress narrative, and corresponds with the city's major economic redevelopment aims surrounding the steel plant. Incidentally, this includes a Sands casino. Further evidence is provided by the museum's own website: "We are building a museum about building America." Every single one of its eleven proposed permanent exhibits has the word "America" in the title. Industry (industrial capitalism?), it proclaims, is the foundation of our country. And machines, rather than human experiences, appear to be at the heart of the museum's conception of industry.
I could go on! (Shocking!) But...I'll spare you the rest. Suffice to say, I'm worried by the NMIH's corporate, top-down approach to industrial history. I'd like to see less PR-speak and more focus on worker experiences, the real contradictions of innovation, exploitation, and daily life, and the unsolved questions of astounding boom and devastating bust that are so apparent on the Bethlehem landscape. Also, maybe a little creative exploration of this landscape itself. I know this is easier said on a blog than done in an old steel mill.
Bethlehem Steel, 2002. Society for Industrial Archeology. |
Steelworker fishing in Bethlehem, PA, 1937. ExplorePAHistory.com. I have to wonder how many eyeballs that fish had. |
No comments:
Post a Comment